Mountain Province Diamonds (OTCMKTS:MPVDF – Get Free Report) and Dakota Gold (NYSE:DC – Get Free Report) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk and valuation.
Analyst Recommendations
This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Mountain Province Diamonds and Dakota Gold, as reported by MarketBeat.com.
Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
Mountain Province Diamonds | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
Dakota Gold | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.00 |
Dakota Gold has a consensus price target of $7.50, indicating a potential upside of 166.90%. Given Dakota Gold’s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dakota Gold is more favorable than Mountain Province Diamonds.
Volatility & Risk
Earnings and Valuation
This table compares Mountain Province Diamonds and Dakota Gold”s top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
Mountain Province Diamonds | $243.43 million | 0.04 | -$32.35 million | ($0.41) | -0.12 |
Dakota Gold | N/A | N/A | -$36.45 million | ($0.31) | -9.06 |
Mountain Province Diamonds has higher revenue and earnings than Dakota Gold. Dakota Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mountain Province Diamonds, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Profitability
This table compares Mountain Province Diamonds and Dakota Gold’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
Mountain Province Diamonds | -31.87% | -3.67% | -1.50% |
Dakota Gold | N/A | -37.64% | -35.60% |
Insider and Institutional Ownership
0.4% of Mountain Province Diamonds shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.4% of Dakota Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Mountain Province Diamonds shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of Dakota Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Summary
Dakota Gold beats Mountain Province Diamonds on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.
About Mountain Province Diamonds
Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. focuses on the mining and marketing of rough diamonds worldwide. The company holds a 49% interest in the Gahcho Kué mine comprising mining leases covering an area of 5,216 hectares; and 100% of the mineral rights of the Kennady North consisting of 22 federal leases and 97 claims covering an area of 113,000 hectares located in the Northwest Territories, Canada. The company was formerly known as Mountain Province Mining Inc. and changed its name to Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. in October 2000. Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. was incorporated in 1986 and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.
About Dakota Gold
Dakota Gold Corp. engages in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties in the United States. It primarily explores for gold deposits. The company holds 100% interest in the Blind Gold, City Creek, Tinton, West Corridor, Ragged Top, Poorman Anticline, Maitland, South Lead/ Whistler Gulch, the Barrick Option, Richmond Hill and Homestake Paleoplacer Properties located in Homestake Mining District, South Dakota. Dakota Gold Corp. was incorporated in 2017 and is based in Lead, South Dakota.
Receive News & Ratings for Mountain Province Diamonds Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Mountain Province Diamonds and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.